If you’re dropping by from the mothership, hi! I’m Rachel. I write now and then about history, academia, research tech and bookporn. Hit the RSS if you’re into any of that, I’d probably like to know you — R. L. 01.09.2011
As some of you know, I am a loyal devotee of DevonThink, and was fortunate enough to have found out about it early on in my research. For four years, over the course of my PhD, I mucked about with it: exploring, optimizing, and adding to it–sometimes systematically, sometimes not. In consequence, it’s a gnarled, twisty and flawed little place (presumably, like the brain whence it sprung).
Nevertheless, I thought I’d offer a tour through my PhD database for several purposes: to allow those who are interested in finding out more about DT to get some specific insight into its uses for humanities research; to document for myself some of the things I did which worked and didn’t; to hear from anyone with more experience in research management systems; and perhaps offer something new or different to those who already use DT or something similar.
(For those who don’t know or use DT, it’s an amazing piece of research management software for Macs, consisting of a smart, flexibly structured database into which one can place all manner of files, web bookmarks, photos and notes. Some use one database for everything; I prefer to allocate one database per project. This post is about my PhD database).
Here’s my root file structure. In this post I’m primarily going to discuss the yellow folders, called “groups”: specifically, Archives, Chronologies, Images, Library, Notebooks and +Notes. (NB: For all images, click to expand).
I suppose I’m a little old-fashioned in my approach to groups. I don’t really exploit the full flexibility of DT — how it allows you, for instance, to “replicate” files in many different places such that changing something in one file will change all instances of that file no matter which group it’s in. Some people are happy, therefore, to have files floating freely across many different groups. To me (stodgy old historian that I am), a file needs to be anchored in one place: it must have a group which is its original container, no matter where else it might also appear. So I have a Research Library group which originally contains my notes on all the books, journal articles and dissertations I read:
and an Archives group which contains my notes from all the repositories I’ve consulted. Here are my groups from the National Archives (TNA) at Kew, London:
though as you can see, I don’t just have traditional archives in there, but also web resources and personal collections: in short, anything that’s a collection of some kind, grouped according to where I physically went and consulted them.
Together, those two basic groups contained the bulk of my research material (over 4000 individual items!), both primary and secondary. Each seminar, interview, book, journal and archive file has a group of its own; everything I know about or learn from that source, and often the source itself in PDF, JPG or DOC form, is in there. With the archives, I generally found it easiest to replicate the tree structure of each individual archive in my own database; so, for example, I’ve followed TNA’s own organizational logic: Cabinet Papers (CAB), Colonial Office (CO), Dominions Office (DO) etc., drilling down in the same way you would drill down in the archives themselves:
Nearly the whole database is, of course, searchable: a feature for which I was increasingly thankful the deeper I got into my research and writing. On the whole, these two groups worked extremely well for me: they made intuitive sense, and were apposite to my research needs. Structurally speaking, I don’t think I’d change this for my next project.
Of the remaining four groups, Chronologies was the most successful, and I’ll discuss it in the next post. Images was created before DT updated to version 2, which included an automatic Images group. Not that I ever did anything particularly clever with my own outdated version: as the subgroup’s name suggests, I used it as a dumping ground for a small, ragtag and totally unsorted collection of images I found interesting over the years:
some of which may find their way into future blog posts.
That leaves Notebooks and +Notes. Neither of these really worked out: in the case of the latter I found a better way to write notes to myself, and in the case of the former, I abandoned it altogether. Notebooks was intended to be a group in which I could collect thoughts and readings about various (rather esoteric) subjects not necessarily related to my PhD. My favourite part of it is the Homeless Quotes group, which grew into a nice collection of amusing, moving or thought-provoking scraps and bons mots I picked up over the years:
I still like the idea behind the Notebooks, but in practice it was too broad-ranging, and too loosely connected to my research, for it to make sense within this database. Its failure in this respect suggests that a DT database, at least for me, has to be bounded and specific to a project.
I’m still thinking, therefore, about the best way to capture and organize all the wider topical reading, thinking and notetaking I do (and want to continue doing) which isn’t necessarily bounded to a particular project. I want to read about European history, behavioural biology, Persian miniatures, Chinese etymology, deep sea marine life, genetics, porcelain trade, group theory and hurricanes. I love and worship Cosma Shalizi’s notebooks, but while the lack of an organizing principle turns his notebooks into a marvellous, sprawling maze of discovery and erudition, I suspect that for lesser mortals such as myself, something much more systematic is required for a lifetime of learning.
Next post: my DT database in meta-mode — after I get back from a holiday.
June 24th, 2011 at 7:02 pm
[…] Leow begins to show how she uses DevonThink for historical research: I thought I’d offer a tour through my PhD database for several purposes: to allow those who are […]
June 27th, 2011 at 7:51 pm
Rachel, thanks for sharing this -excited to read more! It is fascinating (and encouraging) to see how others organize. I use Evernote in a similar way that you seem to have used your DT database (with different notebooks for archive collections, book notes, images etc), but i also write my own notes for potential chapters etc within Evernote (organized in a “notebook stack” which seems to be the same as DT folders). I also have a Refworks account so i can “write-n-cite.” Intrigued to hear more about your “chronologies” folder! thanks for sharing, your blog is always motivating 🙂
July 2nd, 2011 at 10:06 am
[…] Comments « on DevonThink and history research (I) […]
July 2nd, 2011 at 10:08 am
Thanks Rajbir – it’s great to hear from you, and that you’re still doing history! I tried Evernote but it didn’t seem to work for me – I’ve heard that people are either one or the other, but I have many friends who swear by it, and for whom it seems to work very well.
Alas the chronologies discussion didn’t fit into my latest post, but it’ll be in the next one 🙂
August 10th, 2011 at 3:02 pm
[…] last (and much delayed) installment in my short series on using DevonThink for research (See parts 1 and […]
September 1st, 2011 at 8:01 am
[…] Click here to read part one of her three-part series on “DevonThink and history research” and don’t miss to read part 2 and part 3, too. […]
October 5th, 2011 at 11:49 am
This is freaky, Rachel. I have been using Devonthink Pro too for my PhD, and have almost exactly the same filing structure as you, though we have never talked about it and I only found out about your using it from a link here from the Devonthink blog. We must be soulmates. Here is a screenshot to prove it:
October 5th, 2011 at 11:50 am
ok that didn’t work – here: http://www.scrnshots.com/users/macarthurseal/screenshots/294479
October 5th, 2011 at 2:07 pm
Daniel! It’s been a while — hope you are flourishing on the river 🙂 I’m so glad to hear of your most excellent taste in research software. I would love to see more of it when I’m back in Cambridge — next month, if you’re around. I’ll be in touch!
October 5th, 2011 at 2:05 pm
[…] to briefly answer a few questions I’ve been getting in response to my series on DevonThink [1] [2] […]
November 28th, 2011 at 2:49 pm
[…] Leow has a wonderful series of posts on using DEVONthink for historical research: I, II, and […]
May 12th, 2012 at 2:35 pm
[…] my personal predilections and occasional blindspots. As Rachel at A Historian’s Craft has written, an individual’s archival methods and resultant database can look about as different as our […]
May 25th, 2012 at 7:28 am
Devonthink for AFTER the archive?
Thanks for this post and thread, Rachel. Very helpful! I am just now (post-diss, pre-book) trying out new management systems. One thing I have yet to figure out, either in Devonthink or any other management system (Zotero, Sente, etc) is how to search INSIDE pdf annotations. Most of my notes occur here, primarily because I work with large pdf versions of digitized archival material that I need to sort through and organize. Like alot of historians, I am making shorter archival trips, using digital cameras to collect material and then working through it at home. I was hoping Devonthink might work as an all-in-one management system but I haven’t been able to search annotations (whether made elsewhere or in Devonthink) Am I missing something?
So far the only system that (sort of) works is using Acrobat Pro to search through a folder where all my pdfs are stored. It searches all annotations (made in Acrobat) and locates both files and pages. Eaglefiler can search within annotations but it only finds files (you can then open up file and search in Acrobat but this just adds a step). Zotfile is supposed to extract annotations for pdfs in Zotero, thereby making them searchable, but most of the time it doesn’t work.
I am little puzzled why this doesn’t seem to be a bigger issue among historians as we move towards digitized archives (our own and others). Thanks again for this site- it’s helping!
July 3rd, 2012 at 7:00 pm
[…] Rachel Loew’s explanation of how she uses Devonthink Pro Shane Landrum’s thoughts about Devonthink Pro Office […]
October 20th, 2012 at 1:59 pm
[…] and history, including one on DevonThink, a well-spoken of Mac note-taker. The author’s blog posts on her use of DevonThink as a postdoc are the kind of thing we should be talking about more […]
February 18th, 2013 at 9:09 am
[…] on DevonThink and history research → […]
April 10th, 2013 at 10:13 am
[…] thanks to a really helpful series of blog posts by history researcher Rachel Leow, that I read in bed the other night (sad Phd-er that I’ve become) I’ve decided to have another […]
June 18th, 2013 at 11:45 pm
[…] A historian’s craft […]
July 29th, 2013 at 11:15 pm
For those interested, I’ve got a new series of posts on DT for History – primarily using tags for provenance info and groups for thematic categories that DT’s AI can take advantage of (Classify especially).
June 17th, 2014 at 12:31 pm
[…] For more about DEVONThink, check out http://www.gradhacker.org/2013/10/02/building-a-research-database-with-devonthink-pro-office/ (though the price of the program is cheaper as a student/educator then listed in the post) and http://cliotropic.org/blog/2011/10/ocring-archival-research-photos-with-devonthink/ and https://idlethink.wordpress.com/2011/06/24/on-devonthink-and-history-research-i/ […]
June 17th, 2014 at 9:04 pm
[…] For more about DEVONThink, check out http://www.gradhacker.org/2013/10/02/building-a-research-database-with-devonthink-pro-office/ (though the price of the program is cheaper as a student/educator then listed in the post) and http://cliotropic.org/blog/2011/10/ocring-archival-research-photos-with-devonthink/ and https://idlethink.wordpress.com/2011/06/24/on-devonthink-and-history-research-i/ […]
September 3rd, 2014 at 10:22 pm
[…] many of the features I desire. Academics, particularly those in the humanities, have used DTP to good effect. DTP got me only so far though. I could extract information, form hyperlinks, and use ‘Smart […]
December 7th, 2014 at 4:07 pm
[…] Historian (Rachel Leow). Also at Perspectives. […]
February 3rd, 2015 at 11:02 pm
[…] For more about DEVONThink, check out http://www.gradhacker.org/2013/10/02/building-a-research-database-with-devonthink-pro-office/ (though the price of the program is cheaper as a student/educator then listed in the post) and http://cliotropic.org/blog/2011/10/ocring-archival-research-photos-with-devonthink/ and https://idlethink.wordpress.com/2011/06/24/on-devonthink-and-history-research-i/ […]
July 28th, 2015 at 11:21 am
[…] their database in the way that works best for their writing/research style, so be sure to look at Rachael Loew’s and Chad Black’s posts for more […]
February 8th, 2016 at 5:38 pm
Can you explain how you attached images to texts? i.e., attaching photographs of the archived documents by their commentaries? Or do you keep them all separate and simply name them in similar ways to keep them synched?
July 4th, 2016 at 8:13 pm
How do manage bibliographic data? Do you use a separate app for that (e.g., Zotero, Mendeley)?
September 13th, 2017 at 1:54 pm
[…] (Optical Character Recognition) capabilities. (You can find posts on how historians use DevonThink here, here, and here. Some of them are a little older, but I still found them useful.) I use Evernote […]
April 5th, 2020 at 3:59 pm
[…] their database in the way that works best for their writing/research style, so be sure to look at Rachael Loew’s and Chad Black’s posts for more […]