race, race, nothing but race

I’m kind of perturbed by this article in the New York Times on rising ethnic discontent in Malaysia that’s said to have been largely set in motion by the huge protest last November organized by ‘Hindraf’, the Hindu Rights Activist Force. The article says absolutely nothing about the other huge protest in November (indeed twice as large as the Hindraf rally, and arguably a kind of precedent or inspiration for it), the Bersih Rally, which was convened to call for clean and democratic elections, and whose agenda and attendance was specifically on non-racial terms.

But it seems that doesn’t interest the international press. Ethnic tension in the Third World always seems to be a theme that most qualifies it to get international coverage, as though it affirms some long-standing tradition that ethnic tension is What Happens in the Third World. That selectivity annoys me, especially when it comes to Malaysia, where so much is needed to deracialize politics, and to make people stop seeing things in that way — and here we have an international press that only seems to see race conflict amidst a whole plethora of political developments. Does the NYT know that after plans for the Hindraf rally were announced, there was an immediate ferment of discussion about whether or not people could bring themselves to support an Indian race-based protest after all the work that the Bersih Rally did to insist upon its non-racial agenda? Many thought it was counterproductive (here’s Haris Ibrahim on why he refused to support the race-based protest). Some even thought Hindraf’s announcement of the class-action lawsuit against the British government, for injustices wrought unto them during the colonial era, was ridiculous and plain embarrassing. Why cover the racial and in the latter respect somewhat silly Hindraf Rally rather than the non-racial Bersih Rally, when the latter came first, was bigger, much more unprecedented, and arguably had a more widely-applicable agenda?

It seems vicious somehow; ethnic tension in Malaysia is kept in place by ruling elites, discontent expressed in racial terms, racialized political representation (our main political parties are all race parties), the lessons of ethnic discord that our textbooks and school curricula insist we draw from history. Race keeps being important because it is kept important. And now too, it seems, by selective international attention. Thanks a bunch, NYT!


3 responses to “race, race, nothing but race

  • Ivy

    It’s not only NYT. I stumbled on a few articles on academic journals that said nothing more than the racial harmony in Malaysia when its task is to provide a political snaphot of Malaysia.

    It seems that the West is so fascinated by Malaysia’s supposed racial harmony, that they chose to ignore more significant issues like the process of democratization.

  • spsukaton

    “as though it affirms some long-standing tradition that ethnic tension is What Happens in the Third World.”

    OMFG yes. One of my African history professors brought it up in relation to elections in Zimbabwe, Kenya, and South Africa. The Third/Fourth World is, by tacit agreement among journalists, the “place where everything gets fucked up and the West needs to help fix it.”

  • sticks and stones « a historian’s craft

    […] is in the news again for the usual reasons: nine churches firebombed by radical Muslims in the last week, on account of a rising controversy […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: